Respecting Character Wishes?
When I first read Brandon Sanderson's announcement about an asexual character, I noted three things:
- especially in the larger context of queerbaiting, I thought it was very respectful to his fans to acknowledge possible disappointment and explain the decision
- he has sensitivity readers and mentioned the decision was based on how the character feels (which means this wasn't a quick grab for diversity points)
- the character seems* to deprioritize their asexuality, which is an ace experience that I am happy is getting representation
I was happily spreading the word,
when someone countered that this was disrespecting the character's wishes and
used a quote from the very article I'd just read and shared.
“______ would prefer you focus on
other aspects of [their] identity, rather than [their] sexuality.”
I've gone down a rabbit hole thinking about this, and haven't entirely made up my mind. So here's a set of questions to get your head spinning too.
Starter Questions
- Should character wishes be respected?
- Are character wishes a proxy for their creators' wishes?
- Should creator wishes about how their work is treated be respected?
- What do we lose as a community if reader wishes always override creator wishes?
- What do we lose as a community if creator wishes always override reader wishes?
- When might it be worth respecting creator wishes?
- When might it be worth respecting reader wishes?
Scenarios
- Is it disrespectful to be privately happy about the sexuality of a character who would rather you not focus on that?
- Is it disrespectful to blog about or publicly list the sexuality of a character who would rather you not focus on that?
- Is it disrespectful to discuss in closed groups the sexuality of a character who would rather you not focus on that?
- Would your answers change if instead of a character, the target is a celebrity who hasn't specified their sexuality?
- What if they have stated their sexuality and you think it's something else?
- What if the celebrity asked for privacy?
- What if they are a small-time celebrity?
- What if they are a minor?
- What if they aren't a celebrity?
- Would your answers change if instead of sexuality, the topic was:
- gender
- ethnicity
- country of origin
- romantic orientation
- sex history
- criminal history
- addiction
- relationship status
- mental health
- neurodivergence
- illness
- disability
- a history of trauma
- any marginalized identity or experience
- any non-marginalized identity or experience
- If your answers were different for certain topics, why do you assign more/less privacy?
Bonus Round
Try replacing "wishes" in
all these questions with "boundaries," "concerns," or
"needs." Do your answers change?
Why I went down the rabbit hole
- Plan A: a secondary character slips up and almost reveals this private aspect of their identity in a way that will hopefully be obvious to the reader but goes over the main character's head.
- additional clues in what the character is knowledgeable about and other coding tricks
- a note at the end of the book
- a blog post confirming
- a short story from this characters POV confirming
- revealing the private aspect of their identity later in the series
Hurray! I don't need to escape the ethical rabbit hole after all!
*by context of the announcement. I have not read this series.
Comments
Post a Comment